Employers
Job Seekers
Login
Search Query
Jobs
INSTALLATION
CABLE
300
SATELLITE
35
TELCO/DSL
64
OTHER INSTALL
51
DROP BURY
121
DISCO/AUDIT
1
SALES-INSTALL
3
ALARM/AUTOMATION
1
CONSTRUCTION / TECH
AERIAL CONSTR
80
UG CONSTRUCT
289
MDU CONSTRUCT
10
COAX SPLICING
25
FIBER SPLICING
61
LINE/MAINT TECH
17
SERVICE TECH
8
HEADEND/TOWER
1
FIELD ENGINEER
9
OFFICE / OTHER
CUSTOMER SERVICE
SALES
3
ENGINEERING
4
TRAINING
OFFICE/ADMIN
MANAGEMENT
18
WAREHOUSE
2
PLACE YOUR AD
Classifieds
BUCKET TRUCKS
39
OTHER VEHICLES
4
BUSINESS
2
HEAVY MACHINE
11
TOOLS
13
PARTS/MATERIAL
5
OTHER FOR SALE
WANTED TO BUY
MISC. FOR SALE
SEEKING WORK
23
PLACE YOUR AD
Forums
GENERAL
INDUSTRY NEWS
TECH AND SAFETY
BUSINESS
COMPANIES
PERSONALS
SITE ISSUES
OFF-TOPIC
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Directory
Messaging
Checkout
Help and Info
Create your
free
account now!
Sign up
Re: Solving Cable's Upstream Dilemma
Options
Send PM to lazarust326
Email a Copy
Email a Link
Print
View Thread
Reply
Home
Forums
Industry News
#246983
lazarust326
Senior Member
Member #:
27357
Registered:
12/17/2003
Posted:
397
Name:
Christopher H.
Occupation:
Sweep/Ingress,Splicing
Location:
All over the West
Personal:
60-ish
Experience:
~32 years
3/15/2009 10:31:53 AM
yeah whatever happened to frequency stacking. Any PON (Passive Optical Network) means less maintenance.
This is CABL.com posting
#246983
. Tiny Link:
cabl.co/mbcpL
Posted in reply to:
Re: Solving Cable's Upstream Dilemma
by
blur
There are
0
replies to this message
×