CABL Addict Member Splicer Life 4me is not online, or is invisible.
12/2/2010 1:34:58 PM
Splicer Life 4me Member #: 170 Registered: 1996-2001
Posted: 3989 View all posts by Splicer Life 4me
Company: Adapt or Die Occupation: Retired Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Comcast threatens Netflix
Per Philly.com

"


New Netflix product pits Comcast vs. Level 3

By Jeff Gelles

Inquirer Staff Writer

Netflix stirred buzz last week by offering its customers a chance to
bypass both its traditional DVD-rental business and its cable-TV
channels: For $7.99 a month, subscribers could use a broadband Internet
connection and stream movies or TV shows directly to their home
computers or televisions.

Now, Netflix's new business model has erupted into a very public fight
pitting Comcast Corp., the nation's largest broadband company, against a
little-known but leading provider of so-called Internet backbone
services, Level 3 Communications, which handles Netflix content.

Level 3 says Comcast wants to install a "toll booth" at the edge of its
network to limit the impact of potential competitors. The Colorado
company says it is fighting to protect the Internet as a level playing
field for companies such as Netflix that want to use it to deliver
content or applications of users' choice.

Comcast calls the battle an "old-fashioned" commercial dispute between
two large companies that handle and exchange large volumes of data
traffic. The Philadelphia company says Level 3 is trying to "disrupt the
settled economics of Internet traffic to meet its new business plan."

Elevating the dispute's profile is its timing in the midst of two major
dramas that feature Comcast as a lead player.

One is its proposed takeover of NBC Universal, which awaits approval by
the Federal Communications Commission and the Justice Department. The
deal would give Comcast control of a vast array of valuable content from
NBC's fabled television network, its popular cable channels, and
Universal Studios.

The other is the debate over a set of Internet-management principles
known as "net neutrality," which would bar network owners from blocking,
prioritizing, or disfavoring Internet data based on its content or origins.

A key decision by the FCC on net neutrality could come later this month,
analysts say. Open-Internet advocates have been pushing Chairman Julius
Genachowski to adopt strong neutrality principles, against staunch
opposition from Comcast and other network owners.

Some net-neutrality advocates said the Netflix dispute, like the NBCU
merger, illustrated market risks that arise when an Internet service
provider also controls vast amounts of video content.

"If Netflix wants to reach Comcast customers, they have to go through
Comcast - there's no alternative," said Derek Turner, research director
at Free Press, a nonprofit media-policy group. "We need a cop on the
beat to have the ability to intervene in these kinds of disputes on
behalf of consumers."

The details of the fight between Comcast and Level 3 were themselves in
dispute Tuesday, after days of back-and-forth statements over the fees
Comcast has been seeking.

"By taking this action, Comcast is effectively putting up a toll booth
at the borders of its broadband Internet-access network, enabling it to
unilaterally decide how much to charge for content which competes with
its own cable-TV- and Xfinity-delivered content," Level 3 said. "This
action by Comcast threatens the open Internet and is a clear abuse of
the dominant control that Comcast exerts in broadband-access markets as
the nation's largest cable provider."

Comcast responded with a blog post from senior vice president Joe Waz,
who said Level 3's position was "simply duplicitous."

In a letter Tuesday to the FCC, Waz rejected arguments that the dispute
was about anything other than ordinary negotiations between two network
owners that exchange data via a relationship known as "peering" - a
relationship Comcast said was changing because Netflix would soon bring
a large influx of traffic.

"Despite Level 3's effort to portray its dispute with Comcast as being
about an 'open Internet,' it is nothing but a good old-fashioned
commercial peering dispute, the kind that Level 3 has found itself in
before," Waz wrote. ". . . This is not about online video, it is not
about 'paid prioritization,' it does not involve putting 'toll booths'
on the Internet, and it is not about net neutrality."

Netflix declined to comment on the dispute. But Level 3 officials
accused Comcast of doing the distorting.

John Ryan, Level 3's chief legal officer, said more data always flow
from content and application providers toward end users than in the
opposite direction. He said Comcast was using an expected increase in
data requested by its own customers as an excuse to impose a toll,
indirectly, on Netflix.

"I can't guess what their motivation is. But the result of their action
is that it ends up favoring their own proprietary content and
applications and disfavoring competitive content and applications," Ryan
said.

Level 3 "chose to go public reluctantly," Ryan said. "We thought it was
important for policymakers to understand that Comcast not only had the
means, the motive, and the opportunity to discriminate, but that it, in
fact, was doing so."



Dogs aren't our whole life, but they make our lives whole. This member is a Regular Member.
1 Replies
12/2/2010 1:40:03 PM
Splicer Life 4me